[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1316393805-3005-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:56:38 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
davem@...emloft.net, gthelen@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kirill@...temov.name
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] per-cgroup tcp buffer pressure settings
[[ v3: merge Kirill's suggestions, + a destroy-related bugfix ]]
This patch introduces per-cgroup tcp buffers limitation. This allows
sysadmins to specify a maximum amount of kernel memory that
tcp connections can use at any point in time. TCP is the main interest
in this work, but extending it to other protocols would be easy.
For this to work, I am hooking it into memcg, after the introdution of
an extension for tracking and controlling objects in kernel memory.
Since they are usually not found in page granularity, and are fundamentally
different from userspace memory (not swappable, can't overcommit), they
need their special place inside the Memory Controller.
Right now, the kmem extension is quite basic, and just lays down the
basic infrastucture for the ongoing work.
Although it does not account kernel memory allocated - I preferred to
keep this series simple and leave accounting to the slab allocations when
they arrive.
What it does is to piggyback in the memory control mechanism already present in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_mem. There is a soft limit, and a hard limit,
that will suppress allocation when reached. For each non-root cgroup, however,
the file kmem.tcp_maxmem will be used to cap those values.
The usage I have in mind here is containers. Each container will
define its own values for soft and hard limits, but none of them will
be possibly bigger than the value the box' sysadmin specified from
the outside.
To test for any performance impacts of this patch, I used netperf's
TCP_RR benchmark on localhost, so we can have both recv and snd in action.
For this iteration, I am using the 1% confidence interval as suggested by Rick.
Command line used was ./src/netperf -t TCP_RR -H localhost -i 30,3 -I 99,1 and the
results:
Without the patch
=================
Local /Remote
Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans.
Send Recv Size Size Time Rate
bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec
16384 87380 1 1 10.00 35367.21
16384 87380
With the patch
==============
Local /Remote
Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans.
Send Recv Size Size Time Rate
bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec
16384 87380 1 1 10.00 35477.10
16384 87380
The difference is less than 0.5 %
A simple test with a 1000 level nesting yields more or less the same
difference:
1000 level nesting
==================
Local /Remote
Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans.
Send Recv Size Size Time Rate
bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec
16384 87380 1 1 10.00 35305.21
16384 87380
Glauber Costa (7):
Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller
socket: initial cgroup code.
foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.
per-cgroup tcp buffers control
per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem
tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit
Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup
Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 32 +++-
crypto/af_alg.c | 7 +-
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 58 ++++++
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
include/net/sock.h | 127 ++++++++++++-
include/net/tcp.h | 14 +-
include/net/udp.h | 3 +-
include/trace/events/sock.h | 10 +-
init/Kconfig | 11 +
mm/memcontrol.c | 406 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
net/core/sock.c | 103 +++++++---
net/decnet/af_decnet.c | 21 ++-
net/ipv4/proc.c | 7 +-
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 71 ++++++-
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 58 ++++---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 12 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 18 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/udp.c | 20 ++-
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 15 +-
net/ipv6/udp.c | 4 +-
net/sctp/socket.c | 35 +++-
23 files changed, 904 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
--
1.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists