[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E76D810.6010504@ce.jp.nec.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:50:08 +0900
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
CC: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>, agk@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request baset device mapper in Linux
Hi Lukas,
On 09/16/11 23:08, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:49:52PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> Does "with your patch" mean against 3.0.3 or the original 2.6.32 kernel?
>>
>> If you apply the patch to the 3.0.3 kernel do you regain the performance?
>
> Unfortunately, the patch does not help with 3.0.3 kernel
Thanks for the additional testing.
So:
2.6.32.36
no-multipath: 2.8 GB/s
multipath: 600 MB/s
multipath w/ patch: 2.8-2.9 GB/s
3.0.3
no-multipath: ??
multipath: 2.5 GB/s
multipath w/ patch: 2.5 GB/s(?)
Have you tried 3.0.3 without multipath?
> top looks like this:
> 63 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 38 0.0 0:16.65 kswapd1
> 18 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 32 0.0 0:14.38 kworker/4:0
> 19 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 30 0.0 0:20.88 ksoftirqd/4
> 153 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 29 0.0 0:14.46 kworker/4:2
> 62 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 22 0.0 0:09.44 kswapd0
dm-multipath itself does not use workqueue for normal I/Os.
So you might be hitting a different problem.
Thanks,
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists