| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110920120325.25326.11641.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:33:25 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 17/26] x86: arch specific hooks for pre/post singlestep handling.
Hooks for handling pre singlestepping and post singlestepping.
Signed-off-by: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h | 2 +
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
index 2ad2c71..1c30cfd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct uprobe_task_arch_info {};
struct uprobe;
extern int analyze_insn(struct task_struct *tsk, struct uprobe *uprobe);
extern void set_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vaddr);
+extern int pre_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern int post_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern int uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long val, void *data);
#endif /* _ASM_UPROBES_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 8ec759a..da1bc12 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/uprobes.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/kdebug.h>
#include <asm/insn.h>
@@ -395,6 +396,143 @@ void set_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vaddr)
}
/*
+ * pre_xol - prepare to execute out of line.
+ * @uprobe: the probepoint information.
+ * @regs: reflects the saved user state of @tsk.
+ *
+ * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
+ * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
+ *
+ * Returns true if @uprobe->opcode is @bkpt_insn.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+int pre_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct uprobe_task_arch_info *tskinfo = ¤t->utask->tskinfo;
+
+ regs->ip = current->utask->xol_vaddr;
+ if (uprobe->fixups & UPROBES_FIX_RIP_AX) {
+ tskinfo->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
+ regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
+ regs->ax += uprobe->arch_info.rip_rela_target_address;
+ } else if (uprobe->fixups & UPROBES_FIX_RIP_CX) {
+ tskinfo->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
+ regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
+ regs->cx += uprobe->arch_info.rip_rela_target_address;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+int pre_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ regs->ip = current->utask->xol_vaddr;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Called by post_xol() to adjust the return address pushed by a call
+ * instruction executed out of line.
+ */
+static int adjust_ret_addr(unsigned long sp, long correction)
+{
+ int rasize, ncopied;
+ long ra = 0;
+
+ if (is_32bit_app(current))
+ rasize = 4;
+ else
+ rasize = 8;
+ ncopied = copy_from_user(&ra, (void __user *) sp, rasize);
+ if (unlikely(ncopied))
+ goto fail;
+ ra += correction;
+ ncopied = copy_to_user((void __user *) sp, &ra, rasize);
+ if (unlikely(ncopied))
+ goto fail;
+ return 0;
+
+fail:
+ pr_warn_once("uprobes: Failed to adjust return address after"
+ " single-stepping call instruction;"
+ " pid=%d, sp=%#lx\n", current->pid, sp);
+ return -EFAULT;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+static bool is_riprel_insn(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+{
+ return ((uprobe->fixups &
+ (UPROBES_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBES_FIX_RIP_CX)) != 0);
+}
+
+static void handle_riprel_post_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe,
+ struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
+{
+ if (is_riprel_insn(uprobe)) {
+ struct uprobe_task_arch_info *tskinfo;
+ tskinfo = ¤t->utask->tskinfo;
+
+ if (uprobe->fixups & UPROBES_FIX_RIP_AX)
+ regs->ax = tskinfo->saved_scratch_register;
+ else
+ regs->cx = tskinfo->saved_scratch_register;
+ /*
+ * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
+ * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
+ * Fall through to handle stuff like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and
+ * "callq *...(%rip)".
+ */
+ *correction += 4;
+ }
+}
+#else
+static void handle_riprel_post_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe,
+ struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Called after single-stepping. To avoid the SMP problems that can
+ * occur when we temporarily put back the original opcode to
+ * single-step, we single-stepped a copy of the instruction.
+ *
+ * This function prepares to resume execution after the single-step.
+ * We have to fix things up as follows:
+ *
+ * Typically, the new ip is relative to the copied instruction. We need
+ * to make it relative to the original instruction (FIX_IP). Exceptions
+ * are return instructions and absolute or indirect jump or call instructions.
+ *
+ * If the single-stepped instruction was a call, the return address that
+ * is atop the stack is the address following the copied instruction. We
+ * need to make it the address following the original instruction (FIX_CALL).
+ *
+ * If the original instruction was a rip-relative instruction such as
+ * "movl %edx,0xnnnn(%rip)", we have instead executed an equivalent
+ * instruction using a scratch register -- e.g., "movl %edx,(%rax)".
+ * We need to restore the contents of the scratch register and adjust
+ * the ip, keeping in mind that the instruction we executed is 4 bytes
+ * shorter than the original instruction (since we squeezed out the offset
+ * field). (FIX_RIP_AX or FIX_RIP_CX)
+ */
+int post_xol(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct uprobe_task *utask = current->utask;
+ int result = 0;
+ long correction;
+
+ correction = (long)(utask->vaddr - utask->xol_vaddr);
+ handle_riprel_post_xol(uprobe, regs, &correction);
+ if (uprobe->fixups & UPROBES_FIX_IP)
+ regs->ip += correction;
+ if (uprobe->fixups & UPROBES_FIX_CALL)
+ result = adjust_ret_addr(regs->sp, correction);
+ return result;
+}
+
+/*
* Wrapper routine for handling exceptions.
*/
int uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists