[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110920131738.GA29852@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:17:38 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, richard@....at,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] user namespace: usb: make usb urbs user namespace aware
On 09/19, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> Add to the dev_state and alloc_async structures the user namespace
> corresponding to the uid and euid. Pass these to kill_pid_info_as_uid(),
> which can then implement a proper, user-namespace-aware uid check.
IOW, we add the additional "user_namespace *" member/argument, and use
it along with uid/euid.
I am not really sure, but can't we simplify this?
> @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ struct dev_state {
> wait_queue_head_t wait; /* wake up if a request completed */
> unsigned int discsignr;
> struct pid *disc_pid;
> + struct user_namespace *user_ns;
> uid_t disc_uid, disc_euid;
Can't we add "const struct cred *disc_cred" and kill disc_uid/disc_euid
instead?
Then we redefine kill_pid_info_as_uid() as kill_pid_info_as_cred(...cred...),
it can use cred->cred->uid/euid directly.
devio.c does get_cred/put_cred instead of get_user_ns/put_user_ns.
What do you think?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists