[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110920134108.GA30749@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:41:08 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, richard@....at,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] user namespace: make signal.c respect user namespaces
On 09/20, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com):
> >
> > static inline uid_t good_name(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *to)
> > {
> > // the caller does rcu_read_lock() if needed
> > const struct cred *from_cred = __task_cred(from);
> > return user_ns_map_uid(task_cred_xxx(to, user_ns),
> > from_cred, from_cred->uid);
> > }
>
> That looks great, thanks. I couldn't think it up myself, but now that
> I see it in your email, I see this would be very valuable in helping
> make this code more readable :)
Damn ;) The problem is, "the caller does rcu_read_lock() if needed"
can't shut up __rcu_dereference_check(). current_cred() passes c == true
to do this.
This reminds me, __task_cred()->task_is_dead() should go away. Probably
we can replace it with (__t == current). Otherwise send_signal() needs
rcu_read_lock() to avoid the warning from lockdep, or the helper needs
the unconditional rcu_read_lock().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists