[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E780166.6070208@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:58:46 +0800
From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ACPI, APEI, EINJ, Fix resource conflict on some machine
δΊ 2011/9/20 9:38, Huang Ying ει:
> Some APEI firmware implementation will access injected address
> specified in param1 to trigger the error when injecting memory error.
> This will cause resource conflict with RAM.
>
> On one of our testing machine, if injecting at memory address
> 0x10000000, the following error will be reported in dmesg:
>
> APEI: Can not request iomem region<0000000010000000-0000000010000008> for GARs.
>
> This patch removes the injecting memory address range from trigger
> table resources to avoid conflict.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying<ying.huang@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Tony Luck<tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h | 3 +++
> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,17 @@ static int apei_resources_merge(struct a
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int apei_resources_add(struct apei_resources *resources,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> + bool iomem)
> +{
> + if (iomem)
> + return apei_res_add(&resources->iomem, start, size);
> + else
> + return apei_res_add(&resources->ioport, start, size);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apei_resources_add);
> +
> /*
> * EINJ has two groups of GARs (EINJ table entry and trigger table
> * entry), so common resources are subtracted from the trigger table
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ static inline void apei_resources_init(s
> }
>
> void apei_resources_fini(struct apei_resources *resources);
> +int apei_resources_add(struct apei_resources *resources,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> + bool iomem);
> int apei_resources_sub(struct apei_resources *resources1,
> struct apei_resources *resources2);
> int apei_resources_request(struct apei_resources *resources,
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ static int einj_check_trigger_header(str
> }
>
> /* Execute instructions in trigger error action table */
> -static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr)
> +static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr, u32 type,
> + u64 param1, u64 param2)
> {
> struct acpi_einj_trigger *trigger_tab = NULL;
> struct apei_exec_context trigger_ctx;
> @@ -256,6 +257,25 @@ static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trig
> rc = apei_resources_sub(&trigger_resources,&einj_resources);
> if (rc)
> goto out_fini;
> + /*
> + * Some firmware will access target address specified in
> + * param1 to trigger the error when injecting memory error.
> + * This will cause resource conflict with regular memory. So
> + * remove it from trigger table resources.
> + */
> + if (param_extension&& (type& 0x0038)&& param2) {
> + struct apei_resources addr_resources;
> + apei_resources_init(&addr_resources);
> + rc = apei_resources_add(&addr_resources,
> + param1& param2,
> + ~param2 + 1, true);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_fini;
> + rc = apei_resources_sub(&trigger_resources,&addr_resources);
> + apei_resources_fini(&addr_resources);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_fini;
> + }
> rc = apei_resources_request(&trigger_resources, "APEI EINJ Trigger");
> if (rc)
> goto out_fini;
> @@ -325,7 +345,7 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type,
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> trigger_paddr = apei_exec_ctx_get_output(&ctx);
> - rc = __einj_error_trigger(trigger_paddr);
> + rc = __einj_error_trigger(trigger_paddr, type, param1, param2);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> rc = apei_exec_run_optional(&ctx, ACPI_EINJ_END_OPERATION);
> --
Hi, Ying
Would you please add Hui's patch
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=131616383227196&w=2) between patch 5
and patch 6?
Thx a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists