[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yunpqivfbtf.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:55:24 -0700
From: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, "Clark\, Rob" <rob@...com>,
Archit Taneja <archit@...com>
Subject: Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:29:23 +0200, Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to have a model that fits both DSI and SDVO, and the option
> to configure some of it from userspace.
> I thought the purpose of drm_encoder was to abstract hardware like this?
SDVO is entirely hidden by the drm_encoder interface; some of the
controls (like TV encoder parameters) are exposed through DRM
properties, others are used in the basic configuration of the device.
I'm not sure we need a new abstraction that subsumes both DSI and SDVO,
but we may need a DSI library that can be used by both DRM and other
parts of the kernel.
--
keith.packard@...el.com
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists