[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110920172930.GA5318@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:59:30 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com,
paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
mingo@...e.hu, jbottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> [2011-09-19 20:40:53]:
> > Note I was talking about cpuusage. Well, in this case, I myself fail
> > to see the value of the whole cpuusage thing...
If I recall, cpuacct was prototyped by Paul Menage (and later modified
by Balbir) as a way to demonstrate cgroup controller ..It was one
of those "first" cgroups controllers written to demonstrate how cgroups worked.
With regard to its value, it does provide a handy interface to measure
cpu utilization of cgroups (vs having to manually sum up task's
utilization) and afaik libvirt makes use of it (although I
don't think anyone reads it at "high" frequency).
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00801.html
> > Someone that sees
> > further could maybe help us out here? (but this is sideways to the whole
> > discussion we're having anyway)
>
> Would probably do to cc the cpuacct authors in this patch set ;-) I
> think it came from IBM, so I added vatsa.
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists