linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:43:29 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings

On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
> type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> ---
> I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
> but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?
> 

Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
go into the same one.

If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/