[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201109201943.29510.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:43:29 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
> type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> ---
> I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
> but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?
>
Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
go into the same one.
If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists