[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110920181751.GC22317@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:17:51 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, richard@....at,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] user namespace: make signal.c respect user namespaces
On 09/20, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com):
> >
> > I didn't really check, but afaics send_sigio_to_task/etc never use
> > SEND_SIG_NOINFO. And they shouldn't, there is no the sending process.
>
> (I'm sure you're right -
I am not that sure, please recheck ;)
> > I guess ptrace_signal() can even do
> >
> > info->si_pid = task_pid_vnr(current->parent);
> >
> > if (info->si_pid) // same namespace
> > info->si_uid = current_uid();
> > else // can't see the tracer, we are from the sub-namespace
> > info->si_uid = 0;
> >
> > Whatever you like more.
>
> Except you don't have to split pid and user namespaces at the same
> time.
Argh, you mean CLONE_NEWUSER? I fotgot about it. And probably
there is something else which I simply do not know?
I got lost. This means send_signal() can't rely on from_parent_ns.
I have no idea how can we fix sys_kill() without a lot of ugly changes
then.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists