[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgNAki0CtE6a_JLjPUsyozP2cfy_x8MSSYfhu5gMEeRE6Zaww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:24:24 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Man page doc for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE
Hello Eric
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 09/18/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>
>> +
>> +.BR SEEK_DATA
>> +and
>> +.BR SEEK_HOLE
>> +are nonstandard extensions also present in Solaris.
>
> Looks good to me, but you may also want to link to the proposed wording for
> mandating SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA in the eventual POSIX Issue 8 (POSIX 2008 is
> Issue 7):
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=415
>
> Also, it seems a shame that the kernel can fail with EINVAL instead of
> properly emulating SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA even on file systems with no
> underlying support for reporting holes.
Thanks for catching that. I've added that point.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface"; http://man7.org/tlpi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists