[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201109202134.50242.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:34:50 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
> > > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> > > ---
> > > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
> > > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?
> > >
> >
> > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
> > go into the same one.
> >
> > If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.
>
> Already upstream
Ok, I see. I've applied both patches to the fixes branch and will send
it out with the next pull request for 3.1 to Linus then.
Thanks,
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists