[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110919232602.ac450450.akpm00@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:26:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm00@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] lib: add unpack_hex_byte()
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:04:00 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com> wrote:
> >> > Finally, the name is poor. __It starts with "unpack_", so it belongs to
> >> > the "unpack" subsystem. __There's no such thing. __Something like
> >> > hex_byte_to_bin() would be better.
> >>
> >> agreed. __It was suppose to parallel the existing pack_hex_byte().
> >
> > hex_byte_pack() :)
> Have you just proposed to do mass rename of pack_hex_byte() to the
> hex_byte_pack()?
It's very minor, but I suppose we should, if someone feels like it.
We should retain a
char * __deprecated pack_hex_byte(char *buf, u8 byte)
{
return hex_byte_pack(buf, byte);
}
for a few cycles to minimise harm to out-of-tree code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists