[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109211028060.2723@ionos>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:50:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: akpm@...gle.com
cc: cschan@...eaurora.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] kernel/timer.c: use debugobjects to catch deletion
of uninitialized timers
Christine,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, akpm@...gle.com wrote:
> From: Christine Chan <cschan@...eaurora.org>
> Subject: kernel/timer.c: use debugobjects to catch deletion of uninitialized timers
>
> del_timer_sync() calls debug_object_assert_init() to assert that a timer
> has been initialized before calling lock_timer_base(). lock_timer_base()
> would spin forever on a NULL(uninit-ed) base. The check is added to
> del_timer() to prevent silent failure, even though it would not get stuck
> in an infinite loop.
Ok, that makes sense, but the changelog of the debugobjects code wants
a better explanation.
> +/*
> + * fixup_assert_init is called when:
> + * - an untracked/uninit-ed object is found
> + */
> +static int timer_fixup_assert_init(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
> +{
> + struct timer_list *timer = addr;
> +
> + switch (state) {
> + case ODEBUG_STATE_NOTAVAILABLE:
> + if (timer->entry.prev == TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC) {
> + /*
> + * This is not really a fixup. The timer was
> + * statically initialized. We just make sure that it
> + * is tracked in the object tracker.
> + */
> + debug_object_init(timer, &timer_debug_descr);
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + init_timer(timer);
> + return 1;
Can we please remove the WARN_ON() and use the return value in the
debugobjects code? That needs a variant of debug_print_object() to give us
proper state output.
Also the fixup function should check for timer->function == NULL and
set a default stub callback.
Thinking more about that, we should do the same for the
timer_fixup_activate() case.
Can you have a stab at that, please?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists