linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 40/57] dirvers/parisc: irq: Remove IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110921120724.GA2550@zhy>
Date:	Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:07:24 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/57] dirvers/parisc: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:07:04PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> Firstly, we don't need 57 patches doing this ... a single one through
> the trivial tree should be sufficient (and it can nuke the flag at the
> same time).
> 
> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 17:28 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > Since commit [c58543c8: genirq: Run irq handlers with interrupts disabled],
> 
> um, that's commit e58aa3d2d0cc01ad8d6f7f640a0670433f794922

Ah, yes, not sure how I make it wrong.

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/