[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ea1bc31120e0670a044de6af7b3c67203c178065.1316617681.git.mina86@mina86.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:19:05 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...gle.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@...aro.org>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fixup! mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
---
include/linux/page-isolation.h | 4 ++-
mm/page_alloc.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:27 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> +unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned
>> long end,
>> + gfp_t flag)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pfn = start, count;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + struct zone *zone;
>> + int order;
>> +
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(start));
>> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start));
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:05:52 +0200, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This implies that start->end are entirely contained in a single zone.
> What enforces that? If some higher layer enforces that, I think we
> probably need at least a VM_BUG_ON() in here and a comment about who
> enforces it.
>> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
>> +
>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> + for (;;) {
>> + VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page));
>> + list_del(&page->lru);
>> + order = page_order(page);
>> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
>> + rmv_page_order(page);
>> + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
>> + pfn += 1 << order;
>> + if (pfn >= end)
>> + break;
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn));
>> + page += 1 << order;
>> + }
> This 'struct page *'++ stuff is OK, but only for small, aligned areas.
> For at least some of the sparsemem modes (non-VMEMMAP), you could walk
> off of the end of the section_mem_map[] when you cross a MAX_ORDER
> boundary. I'd feel a little bit more comfortable if pfn_to_page() was
> being done each time, or only occasionally when you cross a section
> boundary.
Do the attached changes seem to make sense?
I wanted to avoid calling pfn_to_page() each time as it seem fairly
expensive in sparsemem and disctontig modes. At the same time, the
macro trickery is so that users of sparsemem-vmemmap and flatmem won't
have to pay the price.
diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index b2a81fd..003c52f 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ static inline void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page)
{
__unset_migratetype_isolate(page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
}
+
+/* The below functions must be run on a range from a single zone. */
extern unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, gfp_t flag);
extern int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
gfp_t flags, unsigned migratetype);
-extern void free_contig_pages(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
+extern void free_contig_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned nr_pages);
/*
* For migration.
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 46e78d4..32fda5d 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5716,9 +5716,41 @@ out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM) || defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+
+/*
+ * In FLATMEM and CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP we can safely increment the page
+ * pointer and get the same value as if we were to get by calling
+ * pfn_to_page() on incremented pfn counter.
+ */
+#define __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, increment) \
+ ((page) + (increment))
+
+#define __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn) pfn_to_page(pfn)
+
+#else
+
+/*
+ * If we cross pageblock boundary, make sure we get a valid page pointer. If
+ * we are within pageblock, incrementing the pointer is good enough, and is
+ * a bit of an optimisation.
+ */
+#define __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, increment) \
+ (likely((pageblock_left) -= (increment)) ? (page) + (increment) \
+ : (((pageblock_left) = pageblock_nr_pages), pfn_to_page(pfn)))
+
+#define __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn) ( \
+ ((pageblock_left) = pageblock_nr_pages - \
+ ((pfn) & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1))), \
+ pfn_to_page(pfn))
+
+
+#endif
+
unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
gfp_t flag)
{
+ unsigned long pageblock_left __unused;
unsigned long pfn = start, count;
struct page *page;
struct zone *zone;
@@ -5729,27 +5761,37 @@ unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
- page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+ page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
for (;;) {
- VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page) ||
+ page_zone(page) != zone);
+
list_del(&page->lru);
order = page_order(page);
+ count = 1UL << order;
zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
rmv_page_order(page);
- __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
- pfn += 1 << order;
+ __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(long)count);
+
+ pfn += count;
if (pfn >= end)
break;
VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn));
- page += 1 << order;
+
+ page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, count);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock);
/* After this, pages in the range can be freed one be one */
- page = pfn_to_page(start);
- for (count = pfn - start; count; --count, ++page)
+ count = pfn - start;
+ pfn = start;
+ page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
+ for (; count; --count) {
prep_new_page(page, 0, flag);
+ ++pfn;
+ page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, 1);
+ }
return pfn;
}
@@ -5903,10 +5945,16 @@ done:
return ret;
}
-void free_contig_pages(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
+void free_contig_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned nr_pages)
{
- for (; nr_pages; --nr_pages, ++page)
+ unsigned long pageblock_left __unused;
+ struct page *page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
+
+ while (nr_pages--) {
__free_page(page);
+ ++pfn;
+ page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, 1);
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists