lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ea1bc31120e0670a044de6af7b3c67203c178065.1316617681.git.mina86@mina86.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:19:05 +0200
From:	Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...gle.com>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@...aro.org>,
	Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fixup! mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added

From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>

Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>

---
 include/linux/page-isolation.h |    4 ++-
 mm/page_alloc.c                |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:27 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> +unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned  
>> long end,
>> +				       gfp_t flag)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long pfn = start, count;
>> +	struct page *page;
>> +	struct zone *zone;
>> +	int order;
>> +
>> +	VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(start));
>> +	zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start));

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:05:52 +0200, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This implies that start->end are entirely contained in a single zone.
> What enforces that?  If some higher layer enforces that, I think we
> probably need at least a VM_BUG_ON() in here and a comment about who
> enforces it.

>> +	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
>> +
>> +	page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> +	for (;;) {
>> +		VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page));
>> +		list_del(&page->lru);
>> +		order = page_order(page);
>> +		zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
>> +		rmv_page_order(page);
>> +		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
>> +		pfn  += 1 << order;
>> +		if (pfn >= end)
>> +			break;
>> +		VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn));
>> +		page += 1 << order;
>> +	}

> This 'struct page *'++ stuff is OK, but only for small, aligned areas.
> For at least some of the sparsemem modes (non-VMEMMAP), you could walk
> off of the end of the section_mem_map[] when you cross a MAX_ORDER
> boundary.  I'd feel a little bit more comfortable if pfn_to_page() was
> being done each time, or only occasionally when you cross a section
> boundary.

Do the attached changes seem to make sense?

I wanted to avoid calling pfn_to_page() each time as it seem fairly
expensive in sparsemem and disctontig modes.  At the same time, the
macro trickery is so that users of sparsemem-vmemmap and flatmem won't
have to pay the price.

diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index b2a81fd..003c52f 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ static inline void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page)
 {
 	__unset_migratetype_isolate(page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
 }
+
+/* The below functions must be run on a range from a single zone. */
 extern unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start,
 					      unsigned long end, gfp_t flag);
 extern int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 			      gfp_t flags, unsigned migratetype);
-extern void free_contig_pages(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
+extern void free_contig_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned nr_pages);
 
 /*
  * For migration.
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 46e78d4..32fda5d 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5716,9 +5716,41 @@ out:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM) || defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+
+/*
+ * In FLATMEM and CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP we can safely increment the page
+ * pointer and get the same value as if we were to get by calling
+ * pfn_to_page() on incremented pfn counter.
+ */
+#define __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, increment) \
+	((page) + (increment))
+
+#define __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn) pfn_to_page(pfn)
+
+#else
+
+/*
+ * If we cross pageblock boundary, make sure we get a valid page pointer.  If
+ * we are within pageblock, incrementing the pointer is good enough, and is
+ * a bit of an optimisation.
+ */
+#define __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, increment)	\
+	(likely((pageblock_left) -= (increment)) ? (page) + (increment)	\
+	 : (((pageblock_left) = pageblock_nr_pages), pfn_to_page(pfn)))
+
+#define __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn) (			\
+	((pageblock_left) = pageblock_nr_pages -			\
+		 ((pfn) & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1))),			\
+	pfn_to_page(pfn))
+
+
+#endif
+
 unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 				       gfp_t flag)
 {
+	unsigned long pageblock_left __unused;
 	unsigned long pfn = start, count;
 	struct page *page;
 	struct zone *zone;
@@ -5729,27 +5761,37 @@ unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
 
-	page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+	page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
 	for (;;) {
-		VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page));
+		VM_BUG_ON(!page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page) ||
+			  page_zone(page) != zone);
+
 		list_del(&page->lru);
 		order = page_order(page);
+		count = 1UL << order;
 		zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
 		rmv_page_order(page);
-		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
-		pfn  += 1 << order;
+		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(long)count);
+
+		pfn += count;
 		if (pfn >= end)
 			break;
 		VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn));
-		page += 1 << order;
+
+		page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, count);
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock);
 
 	/* After this, pages in the range can be freed one be one */
-	page = pfn_to_page(start);
-	for (count = pfn - start; count; --count, ++page)
+	count = pfn - start;
+	pfn = start;
+	page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
+	for (; count; --count) {
 		prep_new_page(page, 0, flag);
+		++pfn;
+		page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, 1);
+	}
 
 	return pfn;
 }
@@ -5903,10 +5945,16 @@ done:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void free_contig_pages(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
+void free_contig_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned nr_pages)
 {
-	for (; nr_pages; --nr_pages, ++page)
+	unsigned long pageblock_left __unused;
+	struct page *page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
+
+	while (nr_pages--) {
 		__free_page(page);
+		++pfn;
+		page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, 1);
+	}
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-- 
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ