[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110921094759.22423597@jbarnes-x220>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:47:59 +0530
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Disable eDP VDD in a delayed
work proc instead of synchronously
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:22:03 -0700
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com> wrote:
> There's no good reason to turn off the eDP force VDD bit synchronously
> while probing devices; that just sticks a huge delay into all mode
> setting paths. Instead, queue a delayed work proc to disable the VDD
> force bit and then remember when that fires to ensure that the
> appropriate delay is respected before trying to turn it back on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
> ---
I'm worried this makes our PPS even more complex and hard to follow.
I'd rather see VDD AUX applied only when we need it (dpms, mode set and
detect; for hotplug we can assume the panel is alive) and that we
carefully disable it after waiting for a time after a full PPS on
sequence when doing a mode set or dpms on command.
Having all the power stuff at the highest levels would be clearest I
think.
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists