[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <15B014F7-0085-455D-A641-AA7ADFB68545@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:16:52 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: robherring2@...il.com, dave.martin@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
"interrupt-parent" is defined in the Open Firmware "interrupt mapping"
recommended practice, the same place as "interrupt-map" etc. are.
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to
> handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.
"interrupt-parent" is only meant to be used for the simple cases. It's
quite handy there. It is also required in all "interrupt-controller"
nodes that aren't the root of the interrupt tree.
Segher
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists