[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1316681962-8217-55-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:59:21 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 54/55] Documentation: irq: Change documents related to IRQF_DISABLED
IRQF_DISABLED is a NOOP now, place where suggest to use this
flag also doesn't make sense any more.
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
---
Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt | 21 ---------------------
Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt | 4 +++-
Documentation/scsi/tmscsim.txt | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt
index 53e6fca..b3f514d 100644
--- a/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt
+++ b/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt
@@ -255,27 +255,6 @@ as many vectors for MSI as it could for MSI-X. On some platforms, MSI
interrupts must all be targeted at the same set of CPUs whereas MSI-X
interrupts can all be targeted at different CPUs.
-4.5.2 Spinlocks
-
-Most device drivers have a per-device spinlock which is taken in the
-interrupt handler. With pin-based interrupts or a single MSI, it is not
-necessary to disable interrupts (Linux guarantees the same interrupt will
-not be re-entered). If a device uses multiple interrupts, the driver
-must disable interrupts while the lock is held. If the device sends
-a different interrupt, the driver will deadlock trying to recursively
-acquire the spinlock.
-
-There are two solutions. The first is to take the lock with
-spin_lock_irqsave() or spin_lock_irq() (see
-Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking). The second is to specify
-IRQF_DISABLED to request_irq() so that the kernel runs the entire
-interrupt routine with interrupts disabled.
-
-If your MSI interrupt routine does not hold the lock for the whole time
-it is running, the first solution may be best. The second solution is
-normally preferred as it avoids making two transitions from interrupt
-disabled to enabled and back again.
-
4.6 How to tell whether MSI/MSI-X is enabled on a device
Using 'lspci -v' (as root) may show some devices with "MSI", "Message
diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt b/Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt
index cda5f8f..c5a9904 100644
--- a/Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt
@@ -786,7 +786,9 @@ port address 0x1400.
irqm:1 same as initial settings (assumed BIOS settings)
irqm:2 always totem pole
irqm:0x10 driver will not use IRQF_SHARED flag when requesting irq
- irqm:0x20 driver will not use IRQF_DISABLED flag when requesting irq
+ irqm:0x20 driver will not use IRQF_DISABLED (does not make sense
+ any more since genirq will keep irq disabled and the flag
+ is dead from linux-2.6.35) flag when requesting irq
(Bits 0x10 and 0x20 can be combined with hardware irq mode option)
diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/tmscsim.txt b/Documentation/scsi/tmscsim.txt
index 61c0531..1dee219 100644
--- a/Documentation/scsi/tmscsim.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scsi/tmscsim.txt
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ MHz PCI bus works for me, though, but I don't recommend using higher clocks
than the 33.33 MHz being in the PCI spec.
If you want to share the IRQ with another device and the driver refuses to
-do so, you might succeed with changing the DC390_IRQ type in tmscsim.c to
-IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_DISABLED.
+do so, you should find out what's the mismatch between the shared IRQs,
+and CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ may give you more help.
3.Features
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists