[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKTCnzk=i1a3DHrforcaOCBdhjv1xi=5W=eiJiZoK4BNb3wqVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:41:13 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com,
paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
mingo@...e.hu, jbottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri
<vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> [2011-09-19 20:40:53]:
>
>> > Note I was talking about cpuusage. Well, in this case, I myself fail
>> > to see the value of the whole cpuusage thing...
>
> If I recall, cpuacct was prototyped by Paul Menage (and later modified
> by Balbir) as a way to demonstrate cgroup controller ..It was one
> of those "first" cgroups controllers written to demonstrate how cgroups worked.
>
> With regard to its value, it does provide a handy interface to measure
> cpu utilization of cgroups (vs having to manually sum up task's
> utilization) and afaik libvirt makes use of it (although I
> don't think anyone reads it at "high" frequency).
>
Android makes heavy use of cpuacct as well. We invented it to do cpu
accounting independent of control
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists