[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADZ9YHhk0idJ6DQOfGmHJtY2RrHyk=D_m-wcOgN1rPp7_ommBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:35:23 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix possible recursive locking in hwregs.c
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com> wrote:
>> Calling pm-suspend might trigger a recursive lock in it's code path. In function acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status,
>> acpi_os_release_lock holds the lock acpi_gbl_hardware_lock before calling acpi_hw_register_write(), then
>> without releasing acpi_gbl_hardware_lock, this function calls acpi_ev_walk_gpe_list, which also tries to
>> hold acpi_gbl_hardware_lock and thus causes possible recursive lock.
>
> No, acpi_ev_walk_gpe_list holds acpi_gbl_gpe_lock.
>
Yes, right. Actually, acpi_os_release_lock() tries to hold
acpi_gbl_gpe_lock without releasing acpi_gbl_hardware_lock. Right?
Thanks,
Rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists