linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:45:32 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To:	Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	venki@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, len.brown@...el.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, santosh.shilimkar@...com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics

Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> The following patch series implements global registration of cpuidle
> states, and also has the necessary data structure changes to
> accommodate the per-cpu writable members of the cpuidle_states
> structure.

I reviewed earlier versions of the series, and this version still looks
good to me.  Any reason it is still RFC?

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>

and for the OMAP-specific parts,

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/