linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110922212909.49966cf4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:29:09 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	Dilan Lee <dilee@...dia.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Manjunath GKondaiah <manjunath.gkondaiah@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

Definitely what is needed for some of the x86 SoC stuff and would let us
rip out some of the special case magic for the SCU discovery.

First thing that strikes me is driver_bound kicks the processing queue
again. That seems odd - surely this isn't needed because any driver that
does initialise this time and may allow something else to get going will
queue the kick itself. Thus this seems to just add overhead.

It all looks a bit O(N²) if we don't expect the drivers that might
trigger something else binding to just say 'hey I'm one of the
troublemakers'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/