[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316726569.31040.37.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:22:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Replace kmalloc with vmalloc in seq_files
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 13:57 -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
>
> seq_files are often used for debugging data. When the system is under
> memory pressure, and dumping debugging data starts trying to allocate
> large physically contiguous buffers, it often makes the problem
> worse.
Shouldn't you be using ->next instead of dumping everything in a single
seqop? That way it can return partial buffers and keep state etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists