linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: delete redundant chan_id and chancnt initialization in dma drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4wLyTj0aWv=ODejrCUALBtq7yn9suv0O90Bx+o31C4hdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:42:51 +0800
From:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc:	Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
	Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@...ihalf.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Pelagicore AB <info@...agicore.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: delete redundant chan_id and chancnt
 initialization in dma drivers

2011/9/22 Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2011/9/22 Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> client drivers can request a specific chan_id just like it can request a gpio.
>>>> No dear. That's not gonna fly if we are to have common client drivers
>>>> across SoCs.
>>>>
>>> Btw, I meant you can't simply have clients specify a channel number and
>>> get the channel in a portable manner. Clients need to specify the capabilities
>>> they need of the channel.
>>
>> if the dmac is flexible in design, what you said is right. but the
>> problem is that there are some chips which actually fix one channel to
>> one peripheral.
> Nevertheless it is better to assume the dmac's req-signals could be hacked
> to re-route at even runtime.
> Also it won't work for client drivers that run the same controller on different
> SoC with a different dmac.
>
you mean there is a mapping table in dmac driver. otherwise, there
will always require some changes in client drivers.
-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/