[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E7CA9B1.9070903@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:45:53 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xemul@...allels.com>,
<paul@...lmenage.org>, <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
<daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
<jbottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup
On 09/23/2011 05:09 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>> Android makes heavy use of cpuacct as well. We invented it to do cpu
>>> accounting independent of control
>>
>> But its a massive waste of time to have to iterate a double hierarchy,
>> cache-miss heaven.
>>
>
> By double hierarchy you mean both cpu and cpuacct? What if they are
> not mounted together?
>
>> Or so people really have independent cgroups as well? I thought people
>> just co-mount all this crap.
>>
>
> Please see
> http://code.google.com/p/cgroupmgr/wiki/cgroupsForAndroid
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6814207/android-cpuacct-usage-file
>
> AFAIK, some versions mount cpuacct at /acct and independent of cpu cgroups
>
> Balbir
But then, are they using both cpuacct and cpu cgroup for an independent
group of tasks?
The problem here is that we're gathering the same statistics 3 times
just because we need/want to present then in a different way. This is
really bad design.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists