[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAvzgtZf2pFcKmAvccH4oJuiUJaugWbX1gwng7CK9B2DwN3ocA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:51:36 -0300
From: "Lucas C. Villa Real" <lucasvr@...olinux.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wey-Yi Guya <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initialize pointer on request_firmware
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<lucasvr@...olinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:03:27AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> The patch was in the 2.6.36 kernel, so by nature of that, 3.0 will also
>>> have it, right?
>>
>> Ok, a colleague of mine gave me 3.0.4 to stare at - and you're right
>> the patch is there. So what is still missing is caca9510ff4e5 from
>> upstream which reroutes the exit path so that firmware_p is NULLed
>> before returning -EBUSY.
>>
>> Lucas, can you apply caca9510ff4e5 from upstream and verify it fixes the
>> issue for ya?
>
> Sure. I'll do that tonight and will let you now -- the laptop I'm
> using right now doesn't suffer from that problem.
caca9510ff4e5 fixes it. Thanks for the pointer!
Best regards,
--
Lucas
"If you're looking for a reason I've a reason to give: pleasure,
little treasure"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists