[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1109231431550.2059-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:35:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <richard@....at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] user namespace: usb: make usb urbs user namespace
aware (v2)
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > This should be broken up into two separate patches: One to add
> > > > kill_pid_info_as_cred() and the other to modify the usbfs driver.
> > >
> > > It seems like that would make the first patch harder to review (since
> > > it won't just show the changes from kill_pid_info_as_uid to
> > > kill_pid_info_as_cred), but I'll go ahead and split it up. I assume
> > > kill_pid_info_as_uid should be removed in a third patch?
> >
> > No, what I meant was that all the changes to /kernel/signal.c should be
> > in one patch and all the changes to drivers/usb/core/devio.c should be
> > in a second patch.
>
> But doing that in two patches would not be bisect-safe.
Argh, you're right.
It's not a good idea to combine changes to widely differing subsystems
in a single patch, but luckily this is small enough that it doesn't
matter too much. If nobody else minds, I won't complain.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists