lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1316809586-28529-9-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:26:22 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] perf sort: Fix symbol sort output by separating unresolved samples by type

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>

I took a profile that suggested 60% of total CPU time was in the
hypervisor:

...
    60.20%  [H] 0x33d43c
     4.43%  [k] ._spin_lock_irqsave
     1.07%  [k] ._spin_lock

Using perf stat to get the user/kernel/hypervisor breakdown contradicted
this.

The problem is we merge all unresolved samples into the one unknown
bucket. If add a comparison by sample type to sort__sym_cmp we get the
real picture:

...
    57.11%  [.] 0x80fbf63c
     4.43%  [k] ._spin_lock_irqsave
     1.07%  [k] ._spin_lock
     0.65%  [H] 0x33d43c

So it was almost all userspace, not hypervisor as the initial profile
suggested.

I found another issue while adding this. Symbol sorting sometimes shows
multiple entries for the unknown bucket:

...
    16.65%  [.] 0x6cd3a8
     7.25%  [.] 0x422460
     5.37%  [.] yylex
     4.79%  [.] malloc
     4.78%  [.] _int_malloc
     4.03%  [.] _int_free
     3.95%  [.] hash_source_code_string
     2.82%  [.] 0x532908
     2.64%  [.] 0x36b538
     0.94%  [H] 0x8000000000e132a4
     0.82%  [H] 0x800000000000e8b0

This happens because we aren't consistent with our sorting. On
one hand we check to see if both symbols match and for two unresolved
samples sym is NULL so we match:

        if (left->ms.sym == right->ms.sym)
                return 0;

On the other hand we use sample IP for unresolved samples when
comparing against a symbol:

       ip_l = left->ms.sym ? left->ms.sym->start : left->ip;
       ip_r = right->ms.sym ? right->ms.sym->start : right->ip;

This means unresolved samples end up spread across the rbtree and we
can't merge them all.

If we use cmp_null all unresolved samples will end up in the one bucket
and the output makes more sense:

...
    39.12%  [.] 0x36b538
     5.37%  [.] yylex
     4.79%  [.] malloc
     4.78%  [.] _int_malloc
     4.03%  [.] _int_free
     3.95%  [.] hash_source_code_string
     2.26%  [H] 0x800000000000e8b0

Acked-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110831115145.4f598ab2@kryten
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/sort.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index 401e220..1ee8f1e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -151,11 +151,17 @@ sort__sym_cmp(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
 {
 	u64 ip_l, ip_r;
 
+	if (!left->ms.sym && !right->ms.sym)
+		return right->level - left->level;
+
+	if (!left->ms.sym || !right->ms.sym)
+		return cmp_null(left->ms.sym, right->ms.sym);
+
 	if (left->ms.sym == right->ms.sym)
 		return 0;
 
-	ip_l = left->ms.sym ? left->ms.sym->start : left->ip;
-	ip_r = right->ms.sym ? right->ms.sym->start : right->ip;
+	ip_l = left->ms.sym->start;
+	ip_r = right->ms.sym->start;
 
 	return (int64_t)(ip_r - ip_l);
 }
-- 
1.6.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ