linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Introduce greedy hrtimer walk on idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:47:51 -0700
From:	Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce greedy hrtimer walk on idle

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 11:54 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
>> Comments?
>
> Looks to be a possible IRQ latency issue as well, that can be a lot of
> timers to run..
>

We could add some rate limit on how many timers we service this way
and/or interrupt/disable-enable in the inner loop.
But, this would be a problem with current hrtimer as well. When
sched_tick timer is not around, we may end up servicing lot of timers
depending on number of them and slack. No?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/