[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316825684.6387.5.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:54:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
PeterZijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
ChristophLameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: Fix race condition in memcg_check_events() with
this_cpu usage
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
The code in memcg_check_events() calls this_cpu_read() on
different variables without disabling preemption, and can cause
the calculations to be done from two different CPU variables.
Disable preemption throughout the check to keep apples and oranges
from becoming a mixed drink.
[ Added this_cpu to __this_cpu conversion by Johannes ]
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110919212641.015320989@goodmis.org
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3508777..f823fc8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -683,8 +683,8 @@ static bool __memcg_event_check(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int target)
{
unsigned long val, next;
- val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
- next = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->targets[target]);
+ val = __this_cpu_read(mem->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
+ next = __this_cpu_read(mem->stat->targets[target]);
/* from time_after() in jiffies.h */
return ((long)next - (long)val < 0);
}
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int target)
{
unsigned long val, next;
- val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
+ val = __this_cpu_read(mem->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
switch (target) {
case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH:
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int target)
return;
}
- this_cpu_write(mem->stat->targets[target], next);
+ __this_cpu_write(mem->stat->targets[target], next);
}
/*
@@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int target)
*/
static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
{
+ preempt_disable();
/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(mem, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
mem_cgroup_threshold(mem);
@@ -737,6 +738,7 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
}
#endif
}
+ preempt_enable();
}
static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_cont(struct cgroup *cont)
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists