linux-kernel - Seems the comment of find_next_system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOkaeLJTeewFWpHCVBqNwmuL7nEbFYnrQ86SQOO7fVg_Uc3Q4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:40:52 +0800
From:	Wizard <wizarddewhite@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Seems the comment of find_next_system_ram() is not exact

Hi, Experts

I am a newbie for linux kernel. I just read the code of
find_next_system_ram() in kernel/resource.c

I think the comment of this function is not exact. This says "Finds
the lowest memory reosurce exists within [res->start.res->end)".

While I think the code is to find the lowest memory resource overlaps
[res->start, res->end).

308:      if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end))

If I am not correct, please let me know. :)

BTW, I find the "reosurce" is a typo.

-- 
Wizard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/