[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110924163709.GA6776@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:37:09 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, richard@....at,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] user namespace: make signal.c respect user namespaces
On 09/23, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com):
> > On 09/23, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like I can fix all the
> > > cases
> >
> > except ptrace_signal(). Although we can simply ignore this case, imho.
>
> ptrace_signal() calls send_signal() though.
Confused... I meant the "if (signr != info->si_signo)" case. This is
simple, and I only meant that this case is not that important.
> > > by checking whether si_fromuser(info)
> >
> > I am not sure... sys_rt_queueinfo() is nasty. Plus we have to handle
> > the "fromkernel" case too. May be we can ignore this too.
>
> sys_rt_tgsigqueueinfo() still seems to go through send_signal().
Yes. But how can you fix si_uid? We do not even know if it exists.
Please look at siginfo/_uid, there is a union. We can't know what
the caller of sys_rt_sigqueueinfo() puts in this location.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists