linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: use the same node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110924014534.GY29319@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:45:34 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use the same node_distance for 32 and 64-bit

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 04:03:14PM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> The node_distance function is not x86 64-bit specific.  Having the #ifdef
> around the extern function declaration and the #define causes the default
> node_distance macro to be used in asm-generic/topology.h. This also causes
> a sparse warning in arch/x86/mm/numa.c when CONFIG_X86_64 is not set:
> 
> warning: symbol '__node_distance' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Remove the #ifdef to fix both issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/