[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201109242325.53563.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:25:53 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux-sh list" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, jean.pihet@...oldbits.com,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] PM / Runtime: Don't run callbacks under lock for power.irq_safe set
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
The rpm_suspend() and rpm_resume() routines execute subsystem or PM
domain callbacks under power.lock if power.irq_safe is set for the
given device. This is inconsistent with that rpm_idle() does after
commit 02b2677 (PM / Runtime: Allow _put_sync() from
interrupts-disabled context) and is problematic for subsystems and PM
domains wanting to use power.lock for synchronization in their
runtime PM callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -155,6 +155,31 @@ static int rpm_check_suspend_allowed(str
}
/**
+ * __rpm_callback - Run a given runtime PM callback for a given device.
+ * @cb: Runtime PM callback to run.
+ * @dev: Device to run the callback for.
+ */
+static int __rpm_callback(int (*cb)(struct device *), struct device *dev)
+ __releases(&dev->power.lock) __acquires(&dev->power.lock)
+{
+ int retval;
+
+ if (dev->power.irq_safe)
+ spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
+ else
+ spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+
+ retval = cb(dev);
+
+ if (dev->power.irq_safe)
+ spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
+ else
+ spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+/**
* rpm_idle - Notify device bus type if the device can be suspended.
* @dev: Device to notify the bus type about.
* @rpmflags: Flag bits.
@@ -225,19 +250,8 @@ static int rpm_idle(struct device *dev,
else
callback = NULL;
- if (callback) {
- if (dev->power.irq_safe)
- spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
- else
- spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
-
- callback(dev);
-
- if (dev->power.irq_safe)
- spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
- else
- spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
- }
+ if (callback)
+ __rpm_callback(callback, dev);
dev->power.idle_notification = false;
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
@@ -252,22 +266,14 @@ static int rpm_idle(struct device *dev,
* @dev: Device to run the callback for.
*/
static int rpm_callback(int (*cb)(struct device *), struct device *dev)
- __releases(&dev->power.lock) __acquires(&dev->power.lock)
{
int retval;
if (!cb)
return -ENOSYS;
- if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
- retval = cb(dev);
- } else {
- spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
-
- retval = cb(dev);
+ retval = __rpm_callback(cb, dev);
- spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
- }
dev->power.runtime_error = retval;
return retval != -EACCES ? retval : -EIO;
}
@@ -347,6 +353,15 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *de
goto out;
}
+ if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
+ spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
+
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
+
/* Wait for the other suspend running in parallel with us. */
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait,
@@ -496,6 +511,15 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev
goto out;
}
+ if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
+ spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
+
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
+
/* Wait for the operation carried out in parallel with us. */
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists