[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316950672.3641.3.camel@lappy>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:37:52 +0300
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] smp: Introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask function
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 11:54 +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> +#define on_each_cpu_mask(mask, func, info, wait) \
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, (mask))) { \
> + local_irq_disable(); \
> + func(info); \
(func)(info);
> + local_irq_enable(); \
> + }
> +
Maybe it's worth changing it to be so in case someone passes a func ptr
such as 'ptr[0] + 3'.
--
Sasha.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists