linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1109251612320.11831@axis700.grange>
Date:	Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:19:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

Hi Vinod

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Vinod Koul wrote:

[snip]

> This patch fails to apply for me, can you please rebase it to me tree
> and resend, I will apply it later this week

Sorry, it didn't apply, because I apparently forgot to send out this 
patch:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131695995404173&w=2

which I've also cc'ed to you a couple of minutes ago. With that patch 
applied first, the patch in question

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131386369726846&w=2

still applies cleanly on top of the "next" branch of your slave-dma tree.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/