| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFPAmTQPiHU8AKnQvzMM5KiQr1GnUY+Yf8PwVC6++QK8u149Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:40:52 +0530
From: "kautuk.c @samsung.com" <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: remove sysctl to manually rescue unevictable pages
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 04:29:40PM +0530, Kautuk Consul wrote:
>> write_scan_unavictable_node checks the value req returned by
>> strict_strtoul and returns 1 if req is 0.
>>
>> However, when strict_strtoul returns 0, it means successful conversion
>> of buf to unsigned long.
>>
>> Due to this, the function was not proceeding to scan the zones for
>> unevictable pages even though we write a valid value to the
>> scan_unevictable_pages sys file.
>
> Given that there is not a real reason for this knob (anymore) and that
> it apparently never really worked since the day it was introduced, how
> about we just drop all that code instead?
>
> Hannes
>
> ---
> From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
> Subject: mm: remove sysctl to manually rescue unevictable pages
>
> At one point, anonymous pages were supposed to go on the unevictable
> list when no swap space was configured, and the idea was to manually
> rescue those pages after adding swap and making them evictable again.
> But nowadays, swap-backed pages on the anon LRU list are not scanned
> without available swap space anyway, so there is no point in moving
> them to a separate list anymore.
Is this code only for anonymous pages ?
It seems to look at all pages in the zone both file as well as anon.
>
> The manual rescue could also be used in case pages were stranded on
> the unevictable list due to race conditions. But the code has been
> around for a while now and newly discovered bugs should be properly
> reported and dealt with instead of relying on such a manual fixup.
What you say seems to be all right for anon pages, but what about file
pages ?
I'm not sure about how this could happen, but what if some file-system caused
a file cache page to be set to evictable or reclaimable without
actually removing
that page from the unevictable list ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 3 -
> include/linux/swap.h | 16 ------
> kernel/sysctl.c | 7 ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 130 --------------------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 9e58e71..b9d6e93 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -278,8 +278,6 @@ int register_node(struct node *node, int num, struct node *parent)
> sysdev_create_file(&node->sysdev, &attr_distance);
> sysdev_create_file_optional(&node->sysdev, &attr_vmstat);
>
> - scan_unevictable_register_node(node);
> -
> hugetlb_register_node(node);
>
> compaction_register_node(node);
> @@ -303,7 +301,6 @@ void unregister_node(struct node *node)
> sysdev_remove_file(&node->sysdev, &attr_distance);
> sysdev_remove_file_optional(&node->sysdev, &attr_vmstat);
>
> - scan_unevictable_unregister_node(node);
> hugetlb_unregister_node(node); /* no-op, if memoryless node */
>
> sysdev_unregister(&node->sysdev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index b156e80..a6a9ee5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -276,22 +276,6 @@ static inline int zone_reclaim(struct zone *z, gfp_t mask, unsigned int order)
> extern int page_evictable(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> extern void scan_mapping_unevictable_pages(struct address_space *);
>
> -extern unsigned long scan_unevictable_pages;
> -extern int scan_unevictable_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
> - void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -extern int scan_unevictable_register_node(struct node *node);
> -extern void scan_unevictable_unregister_node(struct node *node);
> -#else
> -static inline int scan_unevictable_register_node(struct node *node)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -static inline void scan_unevictable_unregister_node(struct node *node)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> extern int kswapd_run(int nid);
> extern void kswapd_stop(int nid);
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 4f057f9..0d66092 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -1325,13 +1325,6 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> #endif
> - {
> - .procname = "scan_unevictable_pages",
> - .data = &scan_unevictable_pages,
> - .maxlen = sizeof(scan_unevictable_pages),
> - .mode = 0644,
> - .proc_handler = scan_unevictable_handler,
> - },
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> {
> .procname = "memory_failure_early_kill",
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 7502726..c99a097 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3396,133 +3396,3 @@ void scan_mapping_unevictable_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
> }
>
> }
> -
> -/**
> - * scan_zone_unevictable_pages - check unevictable list for evictable pages
> - * @zone - zone of which to scan the unevictable list
> - *
> - * Scan @zone's unevictable LRU lists to check for pages that have become
> - * evictable. Move those that have to @zone's inactive list where they
> - * become candidates for reclaim, unless shrink_inactive_zone() decides
> - * to reactivate them. Pages that are still unevictable are rotated
> - * back onto @zone's unevictable list.
> - */
> -#define SCAN_UNEVICTABLE_BATCH_SIZE 16UL /* arbitrary lock hold batch size */
> -static void scan_zone_unevictable_pages(struct zone *zone)
> -{
> - struct list_head *l_unevictable = &zone->lru[LRU_UNEVICTABLE].list;
> - unsigned long scan;
> - unsigned long nr_to_scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNEVICTABLE);
> -
> - while (nr_to_scan > 0) {
> - unsigned long batch_size = min(nr_to_scan,
> - SCAN_UNEVICTABLE_BATCH_SIZE);
> -
> - spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> - for (scan = 0; scan < batch_size; scan++) {
> - struct page *page = lru_to_page(l_unevictable);
> -
> - if (!trylock_page(page))
> - continue;
> -
> - prefetchw_prev_lru_page(page, l_unevictable, flags);
> -
> - if (likely(PageLRU(page) && PageUnevictable(page)))
> - check_move_unevictable_page(page, zone);
> -
> - unlock_page(page);
> - }
> - spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> -
> - nr_to_scan -= batch_size;
> - }
> -}
> -
> -
> -/**
> - * scan_all_zones_unevictable_pages - scan all unevictable lists for evictable pages
> - *
> - * A really big hammer: scan all zones' unevictable LRU lists to check for
> - * pages that have become evictable. Move those back to the zones'
> - * inactive list where they become candidates for reclaim.
> - * This occurs when, e.g., we have unswappable pages on the unevictable lists,
> - * and we add swap to the system. As such, it runs in the context of a task
> - * that has possibly/probably made some previously unevictable pages
> - * evictable.
> - */
> -static void scan_all_zones_unevictable_pages(void)
> -{
> - struct zone *zone;
> -
> - for_each_zone(zone) {
> - scan_zone_unevictable_pages(zone);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * scan_unevictable_pages [vm] sysctl handler. On demand re-scan of
> - * all nodes' unevictable lists for evictable pages
> - */
> -unsigned long scan_unevictable_pages;
> -
> -int scan_unevictable_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> - void __user *buffer,
> - size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
> -{
> - proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
> -
> - if (write && *(unsigned long *)table->data)
> - scan_all_zones_unevictable_pages();
> -
> - scan_unevictable_pages = 0;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -/*
> - * per node 'scan_unevictable_pages' attribute. On demand re-scan of
> - * a specified node's per zone unevictable lists for evictable pages.
> - */
> -
> -static ssize_t read_scan_unevictable_node(struct sys_device *dev,
> - struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
> - char *buf)
> -{
> - return sprintf(buf, "0\n"); /* always zero; should fit... */
> -}
> -
> -static ssize_t write_scan_unevictable_node(struct sys_device *dev,
> - struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
> - const char *buf, size_t count)
> -{
> - struct zone *node_zones = NODE_DATA(dev->id)->node_zones;
> - struct zone *zone;
> - unsigned long res;
> - unsigned long req = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &res);
> -
> - if (!req)
> - return 1; /* zero is no-op */
> -
> - for (zone = node_zones; zone - node_zones < MAX_NR_ZONES; ++zone) {
> - if (!populated_zone(zone))
> - continue;
> - scan_zone_unevictable_pages(zone);
> - }
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> -
> -static SYSDEV_ATTR(scan_unevictable_pages, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> - read_scan_unevictable_node,
> - write_scan_unevictable_node);
> -
> -int scan_unevictable_register_node(struct node *node)
> -{
> - return sysdev_create_file(&node->sysdev, &attr_scan_unevictable_pages);
> -}
> -
> -void scan_unevictable_unregister_node(struct node *node)
> -{
> - sysdev_remove_file(&node->sysdev, &attr_scan_unevictable_pages);
> -}
> -#endif
> --
> 1.7.6.2
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists