linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: vme: add struct vme

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:06:55 +0200
From:	Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
To:	Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...com>
CC:	<gregkh@...e.de>, <cota@...ap.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: vme: add struct vme_dev for VME devices

Hi Martyn,

Apologies for the delay, I was on vacation recently.

> I think we can probably merge vme_device_id and vme_dev.
> 
> Since we have a pointer to the vme_bridge, the bus number in vme_device_id is
> kinda superfluous.
> 
> The direction we are heading in makes the slot number far less important, in
> some ways it becomes more of an optional information field (in pre-vme64 racks
> we probably won't know which slot the device we are bound to is in anyway).
> Basically moving from a binding mechanism like PCI to a binding mechanism
> closer to ISA, which matches the (widely used, more historic subset) of
> capabilites of the VME bus. I think we can just move the slot number to
> vme_dev and do away with vme_device_id entirely.

I agree with this. I have, however, done this in a separate patch for clarity.
(I have resent this patch (in RESEND v6) unchanged so you can ack it there).

Thanks!

-- 
/manohar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/