[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110926163426.GA15435@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:04:26 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 17/26] x86: arch specific hooks for
pre/post singlestep handling.
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2011-09-26 16:23:53]:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:33 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > +fail:
> > + pr_warn_once("uprobes: Failed to adjust return address after"
> > + " single-stepping call instruction;"
> > + " pid=%d, sp=%#lx\n", current->pid, sp);
> > + return -EFAULT;
>
> So how can that happen? Single-Step while someone unmapped the stack?
We do a copy_to_user, copy_from_user just above this, Now if either of
them fail, we have no choice but to Bail out. What caused this EFault
may not be under Uprobes's Control.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists