[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110926225159.GA13175@flamenco.cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:51:59 -0400
From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@...ap.org>
To: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, martyn.welch@...com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: vme: add struct vme_dev for VME devices
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:27:15 +0200, Manohar Vanga wrote:
(snip)
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c b/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> index 810fe1f..76e08f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
(snip)
> @@ -1358,26 +1355,29 @@ int vme_register_bridge(struct vme_bridge *bridge)
> * specification.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < VME_SLOTS_MAX; i++) {
> - bridge->dev[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct device), GFP_KERNEL);
> + bridge->dev[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vme_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!bridge->dev[i]) {
> retval = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_devalloc;
> }
> - dev = bridge->dev[i];
> - memset(dev, 0, sizeof(struct device));
> -
> - dev->parent = bridge->parent;
> - dev->bus = &vme_bus_type;
> - dev->release = vme_dev_release;
> + vdev = bridge->dev[i];
> + memset(vdev, 0, sizeof(struct vme_dev));
minor nit, in fact removed in patch 2: memset here is redundant
(see kzalloc above).
The rest looks good.
Emilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists