linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKTCnz=DFUc=s9LzxPp-P2jOPXvNzWj8OswadCR09nVmM=ozxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:36:04 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net, gthelen@...gle.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kirill@...temov.name,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller

>> I know we have a lot of pending xxx_from_cont() and struct cgroup
>> *cont, can we move it to memcg notation to be more consistent with our
>> usage. There is a patch to convert old usage
>>
>
> Hello Balbir, I missed this comment. What exactly do you propose in this
> patch, since I have to assume that the patch you talk about is not applied?
> Is it just a change to the parameter name that you propose?
>

Yes, it is a patch posted on linux-mm by raghavendra

Balbir Singh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/