linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 4/26] uprobes: Define hooks for mmap/munmap.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317123435.15383.33.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:37:15 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 4/26]   uprobes: Define hooks for
 mmap/munmap.

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:14 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> 
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Called from mmap_region.
> > > + * called with mm->mmap_sem acquired.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return -ve no if we fail to insert probes and we cannot
> > > + * bail-out.
> > > + * Return 0 otherwise. i.e :
> > > + * - successful insertion of probes
> > > + * - (or) no possible probes to be inserted.
> > > + * - (or) insertion of probes failed but we can bail-out.
> > > + */
> > > +int mmap_uprobe(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct list_head tmp_list;
> > > +   struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
> > > +   struct inode *inode;
> > > +   int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > +   if (!valid_vma(vma))
> > > +           return ret;     /* Bail-out */
> > > +
> > > +   inode = igrab(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host);
> > > +   if (!inode)
> > > +           return ret;
> > > +
> > > +   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
> > > +   mutex_lock(&uprobes_mmap_mutex);
> > > +   build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
> > > +   list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> > > +           loff_t vaddr;
> > > +
> > > +           list_del(&uprobe->pending_list);
> > > +           if (!ret && uprobe->consumers) {
> > > +                   vaddr = vma->vm_start + uprobe->offset;
> > > +                   vaddr -= vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > +                   if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr >= vma->vm_end)
> > > +                           continue;
> > > +                   ret = install_breakpoint(vma->vm_mm, uprobe);
> > > +
> > > +                   if (ret && (ret == -ESRCH || ret == -EEXIST))
> > > +                           ret = 0;
> > > +           }
> > > +           put_uprobe(uprobe);
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   mutex_unlock(&uprobes_mmap_mutex);
> > > +   iput(inode);
> > > +   return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void dec_mm_uprobes_count(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > +           struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > > +   struct rb_node *n;
> > > +   unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +   n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
> > > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
> > > +   uprobe = __find_uprobe(inode, 0, &n);
> > > +
> > > +   /*
> > > +    * If indeed there is a probe for the inode and with offset zero,
> > > +    * then lets release its reference. (ref got thro __find_uprobe)
> > > +    */
> > > +   if (uprobe)
> > > +           put_uprobe(uprobe);
> > > +   for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> > > +           loff_t vaddr;
> > > +
> > > +           uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
> > > +           if (uprobe->inode != inode)
> > > +                   break;
> > > +           vaddr = vma->vm_start + uprobe->offset;
> > > +           vaddr -= vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > +           if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr >= vma->vm_end)
> > > +                   continue;
> > > +           atomic_dec(&vma->vm_mm->mm_uprobes_count);
> > > +   }
> > > +   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Called in context of a munmap of a vma.
> > > + */
> > > +void munmap_uprobe(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct inode *inode;
> > > +
> > > +   if (!valid_vma(vma))
> > > +           return;         /* Bail-out */
> > > +
> > > +   if (!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_uprobes_count))
> > > +           return;
> > > +
> > > +   inode = igrab(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host);
> > > +   if (!inode)
> > > +           return;
> > > +
> > > +   dec_mm_uprobes_count(vma, inode);
> > > +   iput(inode);
> > > +   return;
> > > +}
> > 
> > One has to wonder why mmap_uprobe() can be one function but
> > munmap_uprobe() cannot.
> > 
> 
> I didnt understand this comment, Can you please elaborate?
> mmap_uprobe uses build_probe_list and munmap_uprobe uses
> dec_mm_uprobes_count. 

Ah, I missed build_probe_list(), but I didn't see a reason for the
existence of dec_mm_uprobe_count(), the name doesn't make sense and the
content is 'small' enough to just put in munmap_uprobe.

To me it looks similar to the list iteration you have in mmap_uprobe(),
you didn't split that out into another function either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/