[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVN33diJAa3yZ4ASuRD+5edDnBcAA-oBntW9k8RpdQOo2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:45:16 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PM/runtime: introduce trace points for tracing
rpm_* functions
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 08:53 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 12:11 +0800, tom.leiming@...il.com wrote:
>> >> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>> >>
>> >> This patch introduces 3 trace points to prepare for tracing
>> >> rpm_idle/rpm_suspend/rpm_resume functions, so we can use these
>> >> trace points to replace the current dev_dbg().
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> include/trace/events/rpm.h | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> kernel/trace/Makefile | 1 +
>> >> kernel/trace/rpm-traces.c | 21 +++++++++
>> >> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >> create mode 100644 include/trace/events/rpm.h
>> >> create mode 100644 kernel/trace/rpm-traces.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/include/trace/events/rpm.h b/include/trace/events/rpm.h
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..ecd40bb
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/include/trace/events/rpm.h
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
>> >> +
>> >> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
>> >> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM rpm
>> >> +
>> >> +#if !defined(_TRACE_RUNTIME_POWER_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
>> >> +#define _TRACE_RUNTIME_POWER_H
>> >> +
>> >> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * The rpm_internal events are used for tracing some important
>> >> + * runtime pm internal functions.
>> >> + */
>> >> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(rpm_internal,
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, int flags),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_ARGS(dev, flags),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> >> + __field( const char *, name )
>> >> + __field( int, flags )
>> >> + __field( int , usage_count )
>> >> + __field( int , disable_depth )
>> >> + __field( int , runtime_auto )
>> >> + __field( int , request_pending )
>> >> + __field( int , irq_safe )
>> >> + __field( int , child_count )
>> >> + ),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_fast_assign(
>> >> + __entry->name = dev_name(dev);
>> >
>> > Don't use pointers, you must copy the name here. Otherwise, if the trace
>> > is read after the device has left, you will be referencing a invalid
>> > pointer and possible crash the kernel.
>>
>> Yes, you right, but __get_str() may introduce some extra loading, could
>> it be changed to below just like what dev_printk does?
>>
>> __entry->name = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
>
> Doesn't help. You just stored a pointer into the buffer. Now if the
> device's module is removed, when you go and read the buffer you will be
> reading a string that no longer exists.
>
> Not to mention, this will never work with tools such as perf or
> trace-cmd, that will just get a pointer address and will try to read a
> string that points inside the kernel.
Ok, sounds like dev_name does not work for the case, I will update
the patch, but I am wondering why no such problem for dev_dbg?
printk still may buffer these for sometime in some cases.
>
>>
>> >
>> > We have ways to express dynamic string fields. Use them.
>> >
>> >> + __entry->flags = flags;
>> >> + __entry->usage_count = atomic_read(
>> >> + &dev->power.usage_count);
>> >> + __entry->disable_depth = dev->power.disable_depth;
>> >> + __entry->runtime_auto = dev->power.runtime_auto;
>> >> + __entry->request_pending = dev->power.request_pending;
>> >> + __entry->irq_safe = dev->power.irq_safe;
>> >> + __entry->child_count = atomic_read(
>> >> + &dev->power.child_count);
>> >> + ),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_printk("%s flags-%x cnt-%-2d dep-%-2d auto-%-1d p-%-1d"
>> >> + " irq-%-1d child-%d",
>> >> + __entry->name, __entry->flags,
>> >> + __entry->usage_count,
>> >> + __entry->disable_depth,
>> >> + __entry->runtime_auto,
>> >> + __entry->request_pending,
>> >> + __entry->irq_safe,
>> >> + __entry->child_count
>> >> + )
>> >> +);
>> >> +DEFINE_EVENT(rpm_internal, rpm_suspend,
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, int flags),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_ARGS(dev, flags)
>> >> +);
>> >> +DEFINE_EVENT(rpm_internal, rpm_resume,
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, int flags),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_ARGS(dev, flags)
>> >> +);
>> >> +DEFINE_EVENT(rpm_internal, rpm_idle,
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, int flags),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_ARGS(dev, flags)
>> >> +);
>> >> +
>> >> +TRACE_EVENT(rpm_return_int,
>> >> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, const char *func, int ret),
>> >> + TP_ARGS(dev, func, ret),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> >> + __field( const char *, name )
>> >> + __field( const char *, func )
>> >> + __field( int, ret )
>> >> + ),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_fast_assign(
>> >> + __entry->name = dev_name(dev);
>> >
>> > Same here.
>> >
>> >> + __entry->ret = ret;
>> >> + __entry->func = func;
>> >
>> > And here. But as this is just __func__, you could use %pS and save the
>> > pointer to the function. This is acceptable as kallsyms will will used
>> > to find the function, and instead pass in __THIS_IP__ to the tracepoint.
>>
>> IMO, __func__ is better than %pS here because %pS will dump some
>> offset info (such as runtime_suspend+0x0/0x158), but which is
>> not needed in this case.( we just need to make return value to match the
>> previous function name, such as below)
>
> This will only work with reading the trace data
> from /debug/tracing/trace, but not from any tools. The pS *will* work
> with the tools as the tools load the kallsyms data, and is smart enough
> to figure this pointer out.
__func__ points to a const string, which will be stored in kernel global
read-only section, I think perf can read correct string from the pointer
anytime, don't I?
thanks,
--
Ming Lei
>
> -- Steve
>
>>
>> rpm_suspend: omap_hsmmc.0 flags=9
>> ...
>> rpm_return_int: rpm_suspend:omap_hsmmc.0 ret=0
>>
>> >
>> > -- Steve
>> >
>> >
>> >> + ),
>> >> +
>> >> + TP_printk("%s:%s ret=%d", __entry->func, __entry->name, __entry->ret)
>> >> +);
>> >> +
>> >> +#endif /* _TRACE_RUNTIME_POWER_H */
>> >> +
>> >> +/* This part must be outside protection */
>> >> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
>> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Makefile b/kernel/trace/Makefile
>> >> index 761c510..56bdab5 100644
>> >> --- a/kernel/trace/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/kernel/trace/Makefile
>> >> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ endif
>> >> obj-$(CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING) += trace_events_filter.o
>> >> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT) += trace_kprobe.o
>> >> obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) += power-traces.o
>> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) += rpm-traces.o
>> >> ifeq ($(CONFIG_TRACING),y)
>> >> obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB_KDB) += trace_kdb.o
>> >> endif
>> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rpm-traces.c b/kernel/trace/rpm-traces.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..998949e
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/kernel/trace/rpm-traces.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * Power trace points
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> +#include <linux/string.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/usb.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> >> +#include <trace/events/rpm.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpm_return_int);
>> >> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpm_idle);
>> >> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpm_suspend);
>> >> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpm_resume);
>> >> +
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>
>
>
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists