[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110927131426.GA21897@aftab>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:14:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:14:54AM -0400, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c between commit b77e70bf3535 ("x86, mce:
> Replace MCE_SELF_VECTOR by irq_work") from Linus' tree and commit
> ef14aea88fee ("x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter()") from the rcu
> tree.
>
> The commit in Linus' tree seem to superced the need for the rcu tree
> patch ... so I effectively dropped the rcu tree change to this file.
Yes, this is correct.
@Frederic, Paul: you guys could probably redo the patch without the
<arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c> hunk or leave it like this and let
Linus know about the conflict when sending the pull request during the
merge window...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists