[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109271128110.17876@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] oom: do not live lock on frozen tasks
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I guess you mean a situation when select_bad_process picks up a process
> which is not marked as frozen yet but we send SIGKILL right before
> schedule is called in refrigerator.
> In that case either schedule should catch it by signal_pending_state
> check or we will pick it up next OOM round when we pick up the same
> process (if nothing else is eligible). Or am I missing something?
>
That doesn't close the race, the oom killer will see the presence of an
eligible TIF_MEMDIE thread in select_bad_process() and simply return to
the page allocator. You'd need to thaw it there as well and hope that
nothing now or in the future will get into an endless thaw-freeze-thaw
loop in the exit path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists