[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110927210849.GD3994@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:08:49 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Manjunath GKondaiah <manjunath.gkondaiah@...aro.org>,
Dilan Lee <dilee@...dia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:50:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Actually, in the next iteration, I'm thinking it would be a good idea
> > to create a new #define to only be used by probe deferral. I want it
> > to be easy to find all the drivers that are using this mechanism
> > without needing to filter all the unrelated hits. However, this is a
> > kernel-only thing so it is probably not appropriate to add it to
> > include/asm-generic/errno.h. I could use some guidance/advice as to
> > the best way to handle this.
>
> include/linux/errno.h already has a bunch of kernel-internal error
> codes that are never supposed to be seen in user space. Just
> add one there, the next free one right now is 517, after
> ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK.
Okay, will do. How does EPROBE_DEFER 518 sound?
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists