linux-kernel - Re: [RFD 3/9] Display /proc/stat information per cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317160096.21836.14.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:48:16 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
	jbottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [RFD 3/9] Display /proc/stat information per cgroup

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 19:20 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +static inline void task_cgroup_account_field(struct task_struct *p,
> +                                            cputime64_t tmp, int index)
> +{
> +       struct kernel_stat *kstat;
> +       struct task_group *tg = task_group(p);
> +
> +       do {
> +               kstat = this_cpu_ptr(tg->cpustat);
> +               kstat->cpustat[index] = cputime64_add(kstat->cpustat[index],
> +                                                     tmp);

So aside from the cputime64_t nonsense you could actually write that as:

		__this_cpu_add(tg->cpustat[index], tmp);

which should yield better asm I think, a quick grep seems to confirm
cputime64_t is indeed a u64 all over so its fair to just ignore that.

> +               tg = tg->parent;
> +       } while (tg);
> +} 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/