[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110927072517.GB11359@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:25:18 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jon Medhurst <tixy@...t.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:25:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> [I have a feeling that I may have reported this previously]
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c between commit e73fc88e19d7 ("ARM: 7059/1:
> LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead of PGDIR_*") from the arm tree
> and commit 99d1717dd7fe ("ARM: Add init_consistent_dma_size()") from the
> arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
This has happened because I've dropped a large chunk of my tree from the
for-next branch due to some horrible conflicts and some bad workflow
practice in a git tree I recently merged (so this merge which I'd
normally do has been exposed.)
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists