lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:27:14 +0200
From:	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>
Cc:	Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [patch] mm: disable user interface to manually rescue unevictable
 pages

At one point, anonymous pages were supposed to go on the unevictable
list when no swap space was configured, and the idea was to manually
rescue those pages after adding swap and making them evictable again.
But nowadays, swap-backed pages on the anon LRU list are not scanned
without available swap space anyway, so there is no point in moving
them to a separate list anymore.

The manual rescue could also be used in case pages were stranded on
the unevictable list due to race conditions.  But the code has been
around for a while now and newly discovered bugs should be properly
reported and dealt with instead of relying on such a manual fixup.

In addition to the lack of a usecase, the sysfs interface to rescue
pages from a specific NUMA node has been broken since its
introduction, so it's unlikely that anybody ever relied on that.

This patch removes the functionality behind the sysctl and the
node-interface and emits a one-time warning when somebody tries to
access either of them.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   84 +++++-----------------------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7502726..71b5616 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3397,66 +3397,12 @@ void scan_mapping_unevictable_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
 
 }
 
-/**
- * scan_zone_unevictable_pages - check unevictable list for evictable pages
- * @zone - zone of which to scan the unevictable list
- *
- * Scan @zone's unevictable LRU lists to check for pages that have become
- * evictable.  Move those that have to @zone's inactive list where they
- * become candidates for reclaim, unless shrink_inactive_zone() decides
- * to reactivate them.  Pages that are still unevictable are rotated
- * back onto @zone's unevictable list.
- */
-#define SCAN_UNEVICTABLE_BATCH_SIZE 16UL /* arbitrary lock hold batch size */
-static void scan_zone_unevictable_pages(struct zone *zone)
+static void warn_scan_unevictable_pages(void)
 {
-	struct list_head *l_unevictable = &zone->lru[LRU_UNEVICTABLE].list;
-	unsigned long scan;
-	unsigned long nr_to_scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNEVICTABLE);
-
-	while (nr_to_scan > 0) {
-		unsigned long batch_size = min(nr_to_scan,
-						SCAN_UNEVICTABLE_BATCH_SIZE);
-
-		spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
-		for (scan = 0;  scan < batch_size; scan++) {
-			struct page *page = lru_to_page(l_unevictable);
-
-			if (!trylock_page(page))
-				continue;
-
-			prefetchw_prev_lru_page(page, l_unevictable, flags);
-
-			if (likely(PageLRU(page) && PageUnevictable(page)))
-				check_move_unevictable_page(page, zone);
-
-			unlock_page(page);
-		}
-		spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
-
-		nr_to_scan -= batch_size;
-	}
-}
-
-
-/**
- * scan_all_zones_unevictable_pages - scan all unevictable lists for evictable pages
- *
- * A really big hammer:  scan all zones' unevictable LRU lists to check for
- * pages that have become evictable.  Move those back to the zones'
- * inactive list where they become candidates for reclaim.
- * This occurs when, e.g., we have unswappable pages on the unevictable lists,
- * and we add swap to the system.  As such, it runs in the context of a task
- * that has possibly/probably made some previously unevictable pages
- * evictable.
- */
-static void scan_all_zones_unevictable_pages(void)
-{
-	struct zone *zone;
-
-	for_each_zone(zone) {
-		scan_zone_unevictable_pages(zone);
-	}
+	printk_once(KERN_WARNING
+		    "The scan_unevictable_pages sysctl/node-interface has been "
+		    "disabled for lack of a legitimate use case.  If you have "
+		    "one, please send an email to linux-mm@...ck.org.\n");
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3469,11 +3415,8 @@ int scan_unevictable_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 			   void __user *buffer,
 			   size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
+	warn_scan_unevictable_pages();
 	proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
-
-	if (write && *(unsigned long *)table->data)
-		scan_all_zones_unevictable_pages();
-
 	scan_unevictable_pages = 0;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -3488,6 +3431,7 @@ static ssize_t read_scan_unevictable_node(struct sys_device *dev,
 					  struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
 					  char *buf)
 {
+	warn_scan_unevictable_pages();
 	return sprintf(buf, "0\n");	/* always zero; should fit... */
 }
 
@@ -3495,19 +3439,7 @@ static ssize_t write_scan_unevictable_node(struct sys_device *dev,
 					   struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
 					const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
-	struct zone *node_zones = NODE_DATA(dev->id)->node_zones;
-	struct zone *zone;
-	unsigned long res;
-	unsigned long req = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &res);
-
-	if (!req)
-		return 1;	/* zero is no-op */
-
-	for (zone = node_zones; zone - node_zones < MAX_NR_ZONES; ++zone) {
-		if (!populated_zone(zone))
-			continue;
-		scan_zone_unevictable_pages(zone);
-	}
+	warn_scan_unevictable_pages();
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ